Process

The question isn't whether AI is useful. It's how to put it to work.

We find the bottleneck that stands to gain most from artificial intelligence, implement it, train the people and follow the result.

Get in touch

• An agent that investigates and acts

  Connected to the company's systems, it works out why this order is late: it cross-checks stock, orders and tasks, shows what it found and takes the next step. What falls outside the pattern it does not decide alone: it goes to a person to approve.

• Asking the system in plain words

  A layer of AI over the system the company already uses, without replacing the system. A person asks — which customers bought less than last quarter — and gets the answer with the numbers behind it, read from the company's own data. The agent sees only what that user could already see.

• From the email to the entry

  The request arrives by email, as a PDF, through a form or as a ticket. The AI reads it, checks it against the company's rules and data, classifies it and files it: into the ERP, updating the CRM, opening the task or answering. Where the decision is expensive, nothing final happens without a person approving it.

Is there a process that still depends on someone checking several systems to decide the same thing every week? That is the right candidate.

We work with what you already use

Common questions

• How long until I see a return, and how do you prove it is there?

  It depends on where the data and the systems you run today actually sit, because the bridges to them may have to be configured or built. With that base in place, the first cases go into production in 30 to 45 days. We measure the indicators before and after, and that is what proves the gain.

• Our data is in the ERP, in spreadsheets and on WhatsApp, and none of it is integrated. Do I have to sort that out before you come in?

  No. That is exactly the work, and the work is ours. We start with the area whose data is easiest to reach, which is where the return shows up first.

• The AI will reach sensitive data — margins, payroll — for some of this. Where does that data sit, and what stops it becoming training for a model somewhere else?

  The data stays where it already is. What leaves your systems is the passage the model has to read to answer that one question. Beyond that, the API contracts from Anthropic and OpenAI say that content is not used for training — which holds for the business plan, not for the personal account somebody signs up for on their own. Where sensitivity is high or regulation asks for it, the model can run inside your own cloud account (AWS, Google Cloud), and there it is guaranteed to stay fully isolated.

• I have people who have been here twenty years and will not want to learn it. Does the training cover that, or will we end up with a tool nobody uses?

  Training is in scope. But what secures adoption is how the tool is fitted to the work. It has to sit inside the person's own flow and take steps away rather than add them. When it saves work for whoever uses it and is intuitive, adoption is assured.

• Six months after you deliver, am I running this myself or depending on you?

  Whatever works better for your operation. We can hand over the source, the documentation and the access keys, and you carry on with your own IT team; or we run the support and the follow-up on what was built, for a recurring fee.

Tell us where AI stalled, or where you do not use it yet.

The call is free and ends in a yes, a no, or "you can handle this yourselves". The person who answers is the person who would do the work. Remote across Brazil, in person in the north of Rio Grande do Sul, where agroindustry and the cooperatives are close enough to visit.

Get in touch